| From: | "Matthew Nuzum" <matt(dot)followers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Joshua D(dot) Drake'" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: performance hit for replication |
| Date: | 2005-04-12 16:55:40 |
| Message-ID: | 425bfd8f.0ca3402b.339b.6cfe@mx.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> >I'm eager to hear your thoughts and experiences,
> >
> >
> Well with replicator you are going to take a pretty big hit initially
> during the full
> sync but then you could use batch replication and only replicate every
> 2-3 hours.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
Thanks, I'm looking at your product and will contact you off list for more
details soon.
Out of curiosity, does batch mode produce a lighter load? Live updating will
provide maximum data security, and I'm most interested in how it affects the
server.
--
Matthew Nuzum <matt(at)followers(dot)net>
www.followers.net - Makers of "Elite Content Management System"
Earn a commission of $100 - $750 by recommending Elite CMS. Visit
http://www.elitecms.com/Contact_Us.partner for details.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-12 17:13:27 | Re: performance hit for replication |
| Previous Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2005-04-12 16:54:52 | Re: performance hit for replication |