Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-09 20:13:00
Message-ID: 419124CC.7020209@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> ... does that help?
>
Ok, so to abbreviate what you and Josh writes into what I had in mind
(??? denotes my own lack of further knowledge):

Master + read-only slaves:
- Slony-I when all sites are trusted
- dbMirror for untrusted slaves and/or table based master slave assignment
- Mammoth Replicator, proprietary ???
- erServer ???

Multi-master:
- C-JDBC, Will be transaction safe once PostgreSQL has XA
- pgPool, not transaction safe ???
(- future, the stuff Jan is working on and Postgres-R)

Perhaps some info about which solutions that are PostgreSQL specific and
which are database agnostic should be added.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-11-09 20:23:10 Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-11-09 20:11:48 Re: PostgreSQL in the press again