From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Date: | 2004-11-09 20:11:48 |
Message-ID: | 20041109161043.U31970@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Christopher Browne wrote:
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net (Peter Eisentraut) wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 9. November 2004 16:47 schrieb Simon Riggs:
>>> I have been asked about why there is no single preferred Replication
>>> Solution etc...; I said it was the nature of the development community
>>> that many ideas are allowed out at once.
>>
>> What are the other solutions?
>
> Mammoth Replicator, and whatever is happening with eRServer these
> days...
eRServer is in the middle of a re-write and code review ... the old
version works well for our clients, but the system requirements grew to be
a *wee* bit larger then we wanted ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-11-09 20:13:00 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-11-09 20:00:32 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |