From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Date: | 2004-11-09 20:23:10 |
Message-ID: | 20041109202310.GG17541@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:13:00PM +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>
> Master + read-only slaves:
> - Slony-I when all sites are trusted
> - dbMirror for untrusted slaves and/or table based master slave assignment
You can do the table-based trick with Slony, too. In fact, AFAIK,
you can do it with every async system.
> - erServer ???
I don't know if anyone is stepping up to take over the BSD version,
but as far as I'm concerned, it's a dead letter. I know there is
some development going on with it at PgSQL, Inc, though.
> - C-JDBC, Will be transaction safe once PostgreSQL has XA
> - pgPool, not transaction safe ???
I think the latter would be, too, if Pg had XA.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-11-09 20:24:28 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-11-09 20:13:00 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |