Re: APR 1.0 released

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: APR 1.0 released
Date: 2004-10-08 15:52:48
Message-ID: 4166B7D0.6010901@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Do we have 'make backend thread safe' listed yet? As I recall it, until
> that gets done, parallelization of anything was considered to be a
> relatively onerous task, no?

ISTM there's no reason we couldn't parallelize query execution using the
same IPC techniques that we use now. What would be the advantage of
using threads instead?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-10-08 15:53:21 Re: Log line prefix on win32
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-08 15:51:40 Re: Rollback on Error