| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: APR 1.0 released |
| Date: | 2004-10-08 15:42:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20041008124209.G935@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Added to TODO:
>
> * Consider parallel processing a single query
>
> This would involve using multiple threads or processes to do optimization,
> sorting, or execution of single query. The major advantage of such a
> feature would be to allow multiple CPUs to work together to process a
> single query.
Do we have 'make backend thread safe' listed yet? As I recall it, until
that gets done, parallelization of anything was considered to be a
relatively onerous task, no?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-08 15:47:39 | Re: APR 1.0 released |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-08 15:42:10 | Re: Log line prefix on win32 |