From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Rollback on Error |
Date: | 2004-10-08 15:51:40 |
Message-ID: | 200410081551.i98Fpef09086@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
I assume this is to be saved for 8.1.
This has been saved for the 8.1 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Paesold wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
> > > On the other hand, the scenario of a psql option (read: I have
> > > given up the idea of a backend implementation) to rollback only
> > > last statement on error is quite different.
> >
> > Sure (and we already have one for autocommit). But I thought you were
> > asking about a backend implementation.
>
> I have implemented what I have suggested for psql. I have attached a first
> patch for review here, because I have a few questions. Also I want to make
> sure the whole thing is reasonable.
>
> I have named the option "IMPLICIT_SAVEPOINTS", because that's what it is. If
> someone has a better name that would describe the purpose of the feature, I
> am happy to change it.
>
> The feature is activated, if
> * \set IMPLICIT_SAVEPOINTS 'on'
> * connection is in "idle in transaction" state
> * psql session is interactive
>
> The code executes an implicit "SAVEPOINT pg_internal_psql" in
> common.c/SendQuery to which it will try to rollback to, if the executed
> query fails.
>
> Open questions:
> * Should psql print a notice in the case of that rollback?
> Something like "Rollback of last statement successful."?
>
> * What is currently missing, is a detection of \i ... obviously this feature
> should not be used for each query in \i. Perhaps only for the whole \i
> command?
> So what should I do to detect \i?
> Add an extra argument to MainLoop, SendQuery and process_file()? (many
> changes)
> Add a global variable in common.c/h (e.g. bool
> deactivate_implicit_savepoints) that can be used in process_file to
> temporarily deactivate the code path?
> (more local changes, but rather a hack imho)
>
> Please have a look at the patch and comment.
>
> Best Regards,
> Michael Paesold
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-08 15:54:12 | Re: Rollback on Error |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2004-10-08 15:36:53 | Re: Current wisdom wrt fsm on 8.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-10-08 15:52:48 | Re: APR 1.0 released |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-08 15:47:39 | Re: APR 1.0 released |