Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-06 06:38:31
Message-ID: 411.1175841511@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
>> the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
>> fraction of infant mortality.

> I've read that much of the damage that causes hard drive infant mortality
> is related to shipping.

Doh, of course. Maybe I'd better go to bed now...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Stone 2007-04-06 11:38:17 Re: SCSI vs SATA
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-06 06:23:56 Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2?