Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-06 11:38:17
Message-ID: 20070406113816.GC4374@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:19:04PM -0400, Ron wrote:
>Both statements are the literal truth.

Repeating something over and over again doesn't make it truth. The OP
asked for statistical evidence (presumably real-world field evidence) to
support that assertion. Thus far, all the publicly available evidence
does not show a significant difference between SATA and SCSI reliability
in the field.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Stone 2007-04-06 11:43:38 Re: SCSI vs SATA
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-06 06:38:31 Re: SCSI vs SATA