| From: | Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
| Date: | 2007-04-06 12:43:36 |
| Message-ID: | 46164078.1080409@3times25.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
>>> the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
>>> fraction of infant mortality.
>
>> I've read that much of the damage that causes hard drive infant mortality
>> is related to shipping.
>
> Doh, of course. Maybe I'd better go to bed now...
>
> regards, tom lane
You actually sleep?
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Geoffrey | 2007-04-06 12:46:11 | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
| Previous Message | Ron | 2007-04-06 12:31:51 | Re: SCSI vs SATA |