Re: ON COMMIT DROP

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ON COMMIT DROP
Date: 2004-04-19 06:44:07
Message-ID: 40837537.2060309@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Where exactly would you propose to stick it in the syntax?

Good question, I don't know.

> Can you do
> it without introducing more fully-reserved words than we have already?

No idea.

> Is there any spec or other-product precedent for it? (Offhand I can't
> even find CREATE TABLE AS in SQL99...)

Weeell. I was just minorly annoyed at having to create table with on
commit behaviour, then insert into select from instead of being able to
do it in one step...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-04-19 08:27:01 fsync thread on linux-kernel
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-04-19 06:33:16 Re: ON COMMIT DROP