Re: ON COMMIT DROP

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ON COMMIT DROP
Date: 2004-04-19 06:33:16
Message-ID: 1082356395.657.1.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 02:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> (Offhand I can't even find CREATE TABLE AS in SQL99...)

This is semi-OT, but CREATE TABLE AS is (new) in SQL2003. At few glance,
the spec's notion of the command is about the same as ours, except for a
few minor syntactic differences (e.g. the [ WITH [ NO ] DATA ] clause
the spec allows for; I'm planning to implement that soon).

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-04-19 06:44:07 Re: ON COMMIT DROP
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-19 06:16:58 Re: ON COMMIT DROP