Re: ON COMMIT DROP

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ON COMMIT DROP
Date: 2004-04-19 06:16:58
Message-ID: 16119.1082355418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is there any reason why the 'ON COMMIT' behaviour feature is not
> available if you use CREATE TABLE AS ...?

Where exactly would you propose to stick it in the syntax? Can you do
it without introducing more fully-reserved words than we have already?
Is there any spec or other-product precedent for it? (Offhand I can't
even find CREATE TABLE AS in SQL99...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-04-19 06:33:16 Re: ON COMMIT DROP
Previous Message George Cristian Birzan 2004-04-19 05:59:54 xlog flush request is not satisfied error