| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events. |
| Date: | 2021-10-25 17:18:26 |
| Message-ID: | 4050629.1635182306@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... But while I agree it's good to remove unused stuff in the
> master, it doesn't seem like we really need to back-patch it.
Yeah, exactly. I don't see any benefit that's commensurate with
even a small risk of breaking extensions --- and apparently, in
this case that's not a risk but a certainty.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-10-25 17:34:37 | Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-25 17:10:25 | Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-10-25 17:24:13 | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-25 17:17:46 | Re: parallelizing the archiver |