| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events. |
| Date: | 2021-10-26 01:19:53 |
| Message-ID: | YXdXuWF2udP86bSk@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 01:18:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ... But while I agree it's good to remove unused stuff in the
>> master, it doesn't seem like we really need to back-patch it.
>
> Yeah, exactly. I don't see any benefit that's commensurate with
> even a small risk of breaking extensions --- and apparently, in
> this case that's not a risk but a certainty.
+1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-10-26 02:20:06 | Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-10-26 00:47:44 | pgsql: Allow pg_receivewal to stream from a slot's restart LSN |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-10-26 01:21:40 | Re: Spelling change in LLVM 14 API |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-10-26 01:15:40 | Re: pg_receivewal starting position |