| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, "pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-18 13:50:14 |
| Message-ID: | 3edc9a43-a162-fd82-5fb6-8137c5afb184@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/18/2016 06:46 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 05/18/2016 06:33 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
>
> On 05/18/2016 09:07 AM, Martín Marqués wrote:
>
> El 18/05/16 a las 09:56, Vik Fearing escribió:
>
>
> 9.6 will be 9.6, the next version will be 10.0 (instead
> of 9.7).
>
>
> This is correct.
>
> I think that 9.7 will be 10, and not 10.0.
>
> Moving to major.minor versioning.
>
>
> This is a strong possibility, but is not yet decided.
>
>
> A community vote:
>
> -1
>
>
> For what reason?
It is a solution in search of a problem and has more to do with
vanity(number envy) then anything. The project has enough legitimate
issues on its table without chasing after made up issues.
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-05-18 13:51:55 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2016-05-18 13:46:47 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |