Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, "pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-05-18 14:04:25
Message-ID: CA+OCxozkzXWPD1ZcNfENevAi1SE1RLJHTZ6AjdVVQ+zXBkT7Kw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:

> On 05/18/2016 06:46 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/18/2016 06:33 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
>>
>> On 05/18/2016 09:07 AM, Martín Marqués wrote:
>>
>> El 18/05/16 a las 09:56, Vik Fearing escribió:
>>
>>
>> 9.6 will be 9.6, the next version will be 10.0 (instead
>> of 9.7).
>>
>>
>> This is correct.
>>
>> I think that 9.7 will be 10, and not 10.0.
>>
>> Moving to major.minor versioning.
>>
>>
>> This is a strong possibility, but is not yet decided.
>>
>>
>> A community vote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>>
>> For what reason?
>>
>
> It is a solution in search of a problem and has more to do with
> vanity(number envy) then anything. The project has enough legitimate issues
> on its table without chasing after made up issues.

It is a solution to the issue that every couple of years we waste a ton of
man-hours on discussions like this. With a move to a 2 digit number, that
stops.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh berkus 2016-05-18 14:05:02 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Michael Banck 2016-05-18 13:57:51 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0