From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, "pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Date: | 2016-05-18 13:46:47 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxozoAt-uQStoec2S35zSZQgnn4tjg+pWFn736143C74KEA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 06:33 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
>
>> On 05/18/2016 09:07 AM, Martín Marqués wrote:
>>
>>> El 18/05/16 a las 09:56, Vik Fearing escribió:
>>>
>>
>> 9.6 will be 9.6, the next version will be 10.0 (instead of 9.7).
>>>>
>>>
>> This is correct.
>>
>> I think that 9.7 will be 10, and not 10.0.
>>>
>>> Moving to major.minor versioning.
>>>
>>
>> This is a strong possibility, but is not yet decided.
>>
>>
> A community vote:
>
> -1
>
For what reason?
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-05-18 13:50:14 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-05-18 13:34:26 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |