From: | Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
Date: | 2002-10-20 02:41:29 |
Message-ID: | 3DB217D9.8050302@xythos.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
I don't object. In fact I have never even looked at this code before
now. I doubt anyone else on the jdbc list would mind either, but it
wouldn't hurt to ask.
--Barry
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver.
>>
>
>>It is java, but only tangentially related to the driver.
>
>
> I doubt that either of us are qualified to opine on that point.
> Perhaps you should be asking in pgsql-jdbc whether it's okay to remove
> contrib/retep. If no one there objects, then I won't complain.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:42:07 | Re: DBD::PG - any works to be compatile with 7.3 ? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:40:33 | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2002-10-20 03:02:37 | Re: new String(byte[]) performance |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:40:33 | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |