Re: /contrib/retep to gborg

I just shot an email over to jdbc. Let's see what they say.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barry Lind wrote:
> I don't object. In fact I have never even looked at this code before
> now. I doubt anyone else on the jdbc list would mind either, but it
> wouldn't hurt to ask.
>
> --Barry
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >
> >>Tom Lane wrote:
> >>
> >>>Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver.
> >>
> >
> >>It is java, but only tangentially related to the driver.
> >
> >
> > I doubt that either of us are qualified to opine on that point.
> > Perhaps you should be asking in pgsql-jdbc whether it's okay to remove
> > contrib/retep. If no one there objects, then I won't complain.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073