| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
| Date: | 2002-10-20 02:30:17 |
| Message-ID: | 8858.1035081017@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver.
> It is java, but only tangentially related to the driver.
I doubt that either of us are qualified to opine on that point.
Perhaps you should be asking in pgsql-jdbc whether it's okay to remove
contrib/retep. If no one there objects, then I won't complain.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:32:06 | Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:17:17 | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:32:06 | Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:17:17 | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |