| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Date: | 2002-01-22 15:59:44 |
| Message-ID: | 3C4D8C70.5000309@pacifier.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. It has no
> restrictions on how the source code may be used. We like it and have no
> intention of changing it.
Much better. I personally think that mentioning the historical
connection (i.e. code developed at Berkeley, released under BSD) would
help quelch the "why not change?" questions. At least I think it makes
a simple answer to such questions. If someone doesn't think that it is
important to respect the license under which the early developers
released their code, that's a clue that they're not clueful enough to
bother talking to, isn't it?
--
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2002-01-22 16:01:39 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2002-01-22 15:55:25 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2002-01-22 16:01:39 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2002-01-22 15:55:25 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |