Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-22 15:55:25
Message-ID: 1011714925.3517.33.camel@osti.knowledgenet.corp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 19:32, Don Baccus wrote:
> Which wasn't my point, see above. There's no license disincentive. I
> didn't argue that there's a license *incentive* working in the GPL's favor.

From what you were saying, it sounded like you were comparing releasing
products on Linux vs. xxxBSD was related to how the OS's were licensed.
Now I understand that you weren't meaning to say that.

--

Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>

D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2002-01-22 15:59:44 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-01-22 15:42:36 Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2002-01-22 15:59:44 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Chris Humphries 2002-01-22 15:50:48 TODO question and claim