From: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Date: | 2002-01-22 16:11:27 |
Message-ID: | 1011715887.1318.36.camel@osti.knowledgenet.corp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 08:59, Don Baccus wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
> > The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. It has no
> > restrictions on how the source code may be used. We like it and have no
> > intention of changing it.
>
Works for me. Can a vote be cast and we be done with it?
--
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-01-22 16:18:24 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-01-22 16:06:05 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-22 16:16:11 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-01-22 16:06:05 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |