Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL
Date: 2001-06-18 23:48:43
Message-ID: 3B2E935B.7D58A92E@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > > Yet ... in the long run that does need to happen, I think. Some day
> > > it'd be nice to see ODBC contain a full parser similar to ecpg's.
> >
> > Hmm I fear the strong binding between the driver and the server.
> > Would the parser always be backward compatible ?
> >
> AFAIK, we would need a completely new ODBC-SQL parser that perses the
> query and then reconstructs it in PostgreSQL-SQL before passing it
> forward
> unless it is for "pass-thru" queries that are the only ones meant to be
> sent directly.
>

How could we know it's a "pass-thru" query ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2001-06-19 00:28:41 Re: Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-06-18 22:15:32 Re: Doc translation