Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL
Date: 2001-06-18 10:29:22
Message-ID: 3B2DD802.EB213F8E@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > Yet ... in the long run that does need to happen, I think. Some day
> > it'd be nice to see ODBC contain a full parser similar to ecpg's.
>
> Hmm I fear the strong binding between the driver and the server.
> Would the parser always be backward compatible ?
>
AFAIK, we would need a completely new ODBC-SQL parser that perses the
query and then reconstructs it in PostgreSQL-SQL before passing it
forward
unless it is for "pass-thru" queries that are the only ones meant to be
sent directly.

--------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pedro Abelleira Seco 2001-06-18 11:17:19 Project: Java administration center
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-06-18 10:24:16 Re: UNIQUE INDEX unaware of transactions (a spin ofquestion)