Re: Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Various silliness in heap_getnext and related routines
Date: 2001-06-19 00:28:41
Message-ID: 20010618192841.A20488@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:21:56PM -0400, Robert E. Bruccoleri wrote:
> Dear Tom,
> >
> >
> > bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) writes:
> > > BTW, given the high level of support that you provide to the PostgreSQL
> > > community, it's very accurate to state that support for PostgreSQL
> > > is far superior to that of Oracle, especially for SGI systems.
> >
> > It's all about having the source code available, I think. After all,
> > it was you who identified the location of the problem...
>
> Yes, but it's not just having the source code. Although I could see
> a potential problem, it was your knowledge of the source code to recommend
> a patch that worked immediately, and your willingness to help
> that together makes PostgreSQL support so good. The same knowledge and
> helpful attitude applies to all the PostgreSQL developers.

Gee, guys, I'm tearing up here. ;-)

sniff -

Ross

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-06-19 00:53:29 Re: timestamp with/without time zone
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-06-18 23:48:43 Re: Update on Access 97 and = NULL