| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "'Andrew Sullivan'" <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'scrappy(at)hub(dot)org'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint? |
| Date: | 2000-09-27 05:34:43 |
| Message-ID: | 39D186F3.587CD0D6@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:
> > > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> >
> > Nope. It has been broken a long time...
>
> Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
> Hiroshi?
> Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
> Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.
>
> Vadim
> 2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3
>
Hmm,it seems that both current and REL7_0_PATCHES
have already been changed.
I committed the the change to current tree and
asked Tatsuo to commit it to REL7_0_PATCHES tree.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-09-27 05:34:46 | RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint? |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-09-27 02:25:25 | Recovery Procedures in 'single user mode' ... |