RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: "'Andrew Sullivan'" <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'scrappy(at)hub(dot)org'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?
Date: 2000-09-27 00:23:57
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D18@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
>
> Nope. It has been broken a long time...

Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
Hiroshi?
Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.

Vadim
2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3

Attachment Content-Type Size
DF.txt text/plain 395 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Finn Kettner 2000-09-27 00:32:01 libpq static link library dowsn't work (M$ VS6)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-09-27 00:06:37 Re: use of / in ~ vs. ~*