RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "'Andrew Sullivan'" <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'scrappy(at)hub(dot)org'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?
Date: 2000-09-27 05:34:46
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D19@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hmm,it seems that both current and REL7_0_PATCHES
> have already been changed.
> I committed the the change to current tree and
> asked Tatsuo to commit it to REL7_0_PATCHES tree.

I also committed current -:))

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2000-09-27 06:31:43 Re: use of / in ~ vs. ~*
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-09-27 05:34:43 Re: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?