From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState |
Date: | 2024-07-18 20:01:19 |
Message-ID: | 3988437.1721332879@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru> writes:
> I fixed it. The code remains the same.
I see the cfbot is again complaining that this patch doesn't apply.
In hopes of pushing this over the finish line, I fixed up the (minor)
patch conflict and also addressed the cosmetic complaints I had
upthread [1]. I think the attached v4 is committable. If Andres is
too busy, I can push it, but really it's his patch ...
(BTW, I see no need for additional test cases. Coverage checks show
that all this code is reached during the core regression tests.)
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2618533.1677874158%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Evaluate-arguments-of-correlated-SubPlans-in-the.patch | text/x-diff | 12.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2024-07-18 20:16:37 | Re: documentation structure |
Previous Message | James Coleman | 2024-07-18 19:18:31 | Re: Seq scan instead of index scan querying single row from primary key on large table |