Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState
Date: 2024-07-18 20:01:19
Message-ID: 3988437.1721332879@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru> writes:
> I fixed it. The code remains the same.

I see the cfbot is again complaining that this patch doesn't apply.

In hopes of pushing this over the finish line, I fixed up the (minor)
patch conflict and also addressed the cosmetic complaints I had
upthread [1]. I think the attached v4 is committable. If Andres is
too busy, I can push it, but really it's his patch ...

(BTW, I see no need for additional test cases. Coverage checks show
that all this code is reached during the core regression tests.)

regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2618533.1677874158%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Evaluate-arguments-of-correlated-SubPlans-in-the.patch text/x-diff 12.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2024-07-18 20:16:37 Re: documentation structure
Previous Message James Coleman 2024-07-18 19:18:31 Re: Seq scan instead of index scan querying single row from primary key on large table