Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState
Date: 2024-07-20 04:17:12
Message-ID: 20240720041712.s5fhvoqyriidwayi@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-07-18 16:01:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru> writes:
> > I fixed it. The code remains the same.
>
> I see the cfbot is again complaining that this patch doesn't apply.
>
> In hopes of pushing this over the finish line, I fixed up the (minor)
> patch conflict and also addressed the cosmetic complaints I had
> upthread [1]. I think the attached v4 is committable. If Andres is
> too busy, I can push it, but really it's his patch ...

Thanks for the rebase - I'll try to get it pushed in the next few days!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-07-20 08:00:00 Re: race condition in pg_class
Previous Message Thomas Simpson 2024-07-20 02:17:52 Re: Enhance pg_dump multi-threaded streaming (WAS: Re: filesystem full during vacuum - space recovery issues)