From: | Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | karl(at)debisschop(dot)net, "J(dot) Atwood" <jatwood(at)bwanazulia(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.0 RPM? |
Date: | 2000-05-10 13:21:12 |
Message-ID: | 39196248.DA0DDDFB@alert.infoplease.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)h00a0cc3b7988(dot)ne(dot)mediaone(dot)net> writes:
> > If you do use these. plan on upgrading once Lamar releases his final. But
> > you should be able to do that without a dump/restore cycle, which was my
> > prime concern.
>
> 7.0RC5 is database-compatible with the final, earlier betas are *not*.
> You can use pg_upgrade to update from any 6.5-or-later version if you
> are feeling adventurous, but I'd definitely suggest making a backup
> first in case things go wrong and you have to initdb and restore.
>
> regards, tom lane
Sorry if I was not clear. The RPMs I prepared use Lamar Owen spec from RC1,
but use final release sources. Upgrading from final release to final release
should not be a problem, I think. I only recommended it because I understand
from his recent posts sthat Lamar has many inprovements to the RPM install
script that I have not taken advantage of.
Karl
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-10 13:39:35 | Re: 7.0 RPM? |
Previous Message | Ron Peterson | 2000-05-10 13:11:02 | Re: libpq.so.2.1 missing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-10 13:39:35 | Re: 7.0 RPM? |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-10 13:04:36 | lsof: can't read inpcb at 0x00000000 |