Re: 7.0 RPM?

From: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: karl(at)debisschop(dot)net, "J(dot) Atwood" <jatwood(at)bwanazulia(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.0 RPM?
Date: 2000-05-10 13:21:12
Message-ID: 39196248.DA0DDDFB@alert.infoplease.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)h00a0cc3b7988(dot)ne(dot)mediaone(dot)net> writes:
> > If you do use these. plan on upgrading once Lamar releases his final. But
> > you should be able to do that without a dump/restore cycle, which was my
> > prime concern.
>
> 7.0RC5 is database-compatible with the final, earlier betas are *not*.
> You can use pg_upgrade to update from any 6.5-or-later version if you
> are feeling adventurous, but I'd definitely suggest making a backup
> first in case things go wrong and you have to initdb and restore.
>
> regards, tom lane

Sorry if I was not clear. The RPMs I prepared use Lamar Owen spec from RC1,
but use final release sources. Upgrading from final release to final release
should not be a problem, I think. I only recommended it because I understand
from his recent posts sthat Lamar has many inprovements to the RPM install
script that I have not taken advantage of.

Karl

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-10 13:39:35 Re: 7.0 RPM?
Previous Message Ron Peterson 2000-05-10 13:11:02 Re: libpq.so.2.1 missing

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-10 13:39:35 Re: 7.0 RPM?
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-10 13:04:36 lsof: can't read inpcb at 0x00000000