| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | karl(at)debisschop(dot)net |
| Cc: | "J(dot) Atwood" <jatwood(at)bwanazulia(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.0 RPM? |
| Date: | 2000-05-10 04:31:03 |
| Message-ID: | 16749.957933063@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)h00a0cc3b7988(dot)ne(dot)mediaone(dot)net> writes:
> If you do use these. plan on upgrading once Lamar releases his final. But
> you should be able to do that without a dump/restore cycle, which was my
> prime concern.
7.0RC5 is database-compatible with the final, earlier betas are *not*.
You can use pg_upgrade to update from any 6.5-or-later version if you
are feeling adventurous, but I'd definitely suggest making a backup
first in case things go wrong and you have to initdb and restore.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitesh Patel | 2000-05-10 06:59:31 | Re: textpos() function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-10 04:25:46 | Re: textpos() function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Robinson | 2000-05-10 04:48:48 | Re: |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-10 03:47:39 | Re: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? |