Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Date: 1998-10-15 16:08:23
Message-ID: 36261DF7.D20368A0@trust.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:

> And I got the time to hack around about this.
>
<...
a lovely explanation of a patch to achiev 60X speedup
for a typical web query
...>

> The speedup for the cursor/fetch scenario is so impressive
> that I'll create a post 6.4 patch. I don't want it in 6.4
> because there is absolutely no query in the whole regression
> test, where it suppresses the sort node.

Good, then it works as expected ;)

More seriously, it is not within powers of current regression test
framework to test speed improvements (only the case where
performance-wise bad implementation will actually crash the backend,
as in the cnfify problem, but AFAIK we dont test for those now)

> So we have absolutely no check that it doesn't break anything.

If it did pass the regression, then IMHO it did not break anything.

I would vote for putting it in (maybe with a
'set fix_optimiser_stupidity on' safeguard to enable it). I see no
reason to postpone it to 6.4.1 and force almost everybody to first
patch their copy and then upgrade very soon.

I would even go far enough to call it a bugfix, as it does not really
introduce any new functionality only fixes some existing functionality
so that much bigger databases can be actually used.

I would compare it in this sense to finding the places where
username/password get truncated below their actual values in pg_passwd
;)

---------------
Hannu Krosing

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-15 16:09:26 Re: AW: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-15 16:06:04 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...