Re: AW: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at (Andreas Zeugswetter)
Cc: darcy(at)druid(dot)net, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...
Date: 1998-10-15 16:09:26
Message-ID: 199810151609.MAA15256@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The problem is probably that the functions incorrectly return text *
> but use it like char *. text * is a varlena
>
> e.g. text *inet_netmask in inet.c
> eighter must be char *inet_netmask or correctly use macros VARDATA and VARSIZE

No, they are missing sections as we wait for additional inet functions.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-15 16:12:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 1998-10-15 16:08:23 Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?