From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | hannu(at)trust(dot)ee (Hannu Krosing) |
Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? |
Date: | 1998-10-15 16:42:00 |
Message-ID: | 199810151642.MAA17626@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I would even go far enough to call it a bugfix, as it does not really
> introduce any new functionality only fixes some existing functionality
> so that much bigger databases can be actually used.
>
> I would compare it in this sense to finding the places where
> username/password get truncated below their actual values in pg_passwd
> ;)
We just can't test is on the wide variation of people's queries, though
passing the regression test is a good indication it is OK.
However, we are very close to release. Yes, I know it is a pain to
wait, but we are not even done discussion all the options yet, and I
still have the cnfify fix to look at.
I am sure we will have post 6.4 releases, just like we have everyone
runing 6.3.2 rather than 6.3. There will be other now-undiscovered
fixes in post 6.4 cleanup releases, and we will hopefully have a _full_
solution to the problem at that point.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1998-10-15 16:58:37 | Did the inet type get backed out? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-10-15 16:36:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path |