Re: [HACKERS] Preprocessor

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Preprocessor
Date: 1998-02-05 16:13:52
Message-ID: 34D9E540.F5D2ED0B@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes wrote:

> I've just send the tar file to the patches list (hope that was correct). I'd
> like to have it included in the archive before starting more work on it.
>
> We have to decide which extension to use for embedded SQL code. Oracle
> already uses *.pc so that doesn't look good. Or shall we make it as
> compatible to Oracle as possible and use *.pc. Alternatively, how about
> *.pqc?

Ingres uses ".sc", which I imagine represented "sql c". Applix ships files for
their database interface labeled with ".ec", which I assume represents
"embedded c". I like the ".sc" myself, but that may be because I've worked with
it for years :) I would think any label you choose does not need to be unique.
What does ".pc" indicate?

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1998-02-05 16:16:01 Re: [HACKERS] Bug?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1998-02-05 16:13:36 Re: [HACKERS] PL code and fmgr_addr