| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Preprocessor |
| Date: | 1998-02-05 16:13:52 |
| Message-ID: | 34D9E540.F5D2ED0B@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes wrote:
> I've just send the tar file to the patches list (hope that was correct). I'd
> like to have it included in the archive before starting more work on it.
>
> We have to decide which extension to use for embedded SQL code. Oracle
> already uses *.pc so that doesn't look good. Or shall we make it as
> compatible to Oracle as possible and use *.pc. Alternatively, how about
> *.pqc?
Ingres uses ".sc", which I imagine represented "sql c". Applix ships files for
their database interface labeled with ".ec", which I assume represents
"embedded c". I like the ".sc" myself, but that may be because I've worked with
it for years :) I would think any label you choose does not need to be unique.
What does ".pc" indicate?
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-02-05 16:16:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug? |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-02-05 16:13:36 | Re: [HACKERS] PL code and fmgr_addr |