| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Preprocessor |
| Date: | 1998-02-05 17:15:24 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.3.95.980205121513.28062R-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> > I've just send the tar file to the patches list (hope that was correct). I'd
> > like to have it included in the archive before starting more work on it.
> >
> > We have to decide which extension to use for embedded SQL code. Oracle
> > already uses *.pc so that doesn't look good. Or shall we make it as
> > compatible to Oracle as possible and use *.pc. Alternatively, how about
> > *.pqc?
>
> Ingres uses ".sc", which I imagine represented "sql c". Applix ships files for
> their database interface labeled with ".ec", which I assume represents
> "embedded c". I like the ".sc" myself, but that may be because I've worked with
> it for years :) I would think any label you choose does not need to be unique.
> What does ".pc" indicate?
postgresql c?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sferac | 1998-02-05 17:15:55 | connection error |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-02-05 17:00:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] impossible insert data into VARCHAR |