From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, jiye_sw(at)126(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17633: Define rule on views which do insert to another relation trigger cache lookup failed error. |
Date: | 2022-10-11 15:37:12 |
Message-ID: | 348879.1665502632@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote:
> I think the basic problem is that the two calls of rewriteValuesRTE
> are really dealing with fundamentally different cases, and we should
> probably not have tried to make the same function do both. I'm going
> to try splitting it into two functions, one for the force_nulls case
> and one for the !force_nulls case.
As attached. This seems *way* cleaner to me, even if it means we need
two copies of the loops-over-VALUES-list-entries. I didn't write a
regression test yet, but this fixes the submitted bug and passes
check-world.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix-bug-17633.patch | text/x-diff | 6.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Blum, Kimber | 2022-10-11 15:57:29 | RE: BUG #17634: Inconsistent view_definition in information_schema.views |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-10-11 15:07:45 | Re: BUG #17633: Define rule on views which do insert to another relation trigger cache lookup failed error. |