From: | Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Release for 9.5 |
Date: | 2015-11-12 23:14:29 |
Message-ID: | 2FDC6F2C-A4A3-4906-B950-F908E99F4244@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12 November 2015 at 17:35, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov
> <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I'd like to not use postgresql's version number in our artifacts.
> >
>
> I agree. The only issue is the numbering is used on some Maven
> repository sites to indicate new versions. If we go to a version
> number less than the current one, it might not be recognised.
>
> It might be a good opportunity to adopt http://semver.org/ too?
>
> fine with me.
+1 to semver, although it seems unlikely that we'd change the major version (backwards compatibility break)
anytime soon
>
> Does the version number need to be in the artifact name or just the version in the pom?
Nope, just the version -- the artifact name should stay constant
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sehrope Sarkuni | 2015-11-12 23:52:24 | Re: Release for 9.5 |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2015-11-12 22:59:50 | Re: Release for 9.5 |