| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release for 9.5 |
| Date: | 2015-11-12 22:59:50 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HH+cwxG8s9fZMtMrzznm4nzMK_oGVKCM7=3jeKWH1F3jYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 12 November 2015 at 17:35, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov
> <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I'd like to not use postgresql's version number in our artifacts.
> >
>
> I agree. The only issue is the numbering is used on some Maven
> repository sites to indicate new versions. If we go to a version
> number less than the current one, it might not be recognised.
>
> It might be a good opportunity to adopt http://semver.org/ too?
>
fine with me.
Does the version number need to be in the artifact name or just the version
in the pom?
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steven Schlansker | 2015-11-12 23:14:29 | Re: Release for 9.5 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Nelson | 2015-11-12 22:35:34 | Re: Release for 9.5 |