From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop? |
Date: | 2024-08-02 14:11:10 |
Message-ID: | 29C47E3C-4519-4A89-A748-0AEBB810BF0A@justatheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 1, 2024, at 18:54, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Done (e52a44b8, 91f498fd).
>
> Any elucidation on how and why Windows machines have started using
> UTF-8 would be welcome.
Haven’t been following this thread, but this post reminded me of an issue I saw with locales on Windows[1]. Could it be that the introduction of Universal CRT[2] in Windows 10 has improved UTF-8 support?
Bit of a wild guess, but I assume worth bringing up at least.
D
[1]: https://github.com/shogo82148/actions-setup-perl/issues/1713
[2]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/porting/upgrade-your-code-to-the-universal-crt?view=msvc-170
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-08-02 14:14:52 | Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2024-08-02 13:58:37 | Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? |