Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?
Date: 2024-08-01 22:54:02
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLXs90LNh0x7_2+FZsgdAWA608hYUGucKs7o7cpYqXkTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:37 AM Oleg Tselebrovskiy
<o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I would appreciate if you would backpatch this change to 15 and 16
> branches.

Done (e52a44b8, 91f498fd).

Any elucidation on how and why Windows machines have started using
UTF-8 would be welcome.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-08-01 23:11:29 Re: Use pgBufferUsage for block reporting in analyze
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-08-01 22:51:57 Casts from jsonb to other types should cope with json null