Re: system views for walsender activity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: system views for walsender activity
Date: 2011-01-07 19:51:39
Message-ID: 29615.1294429899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> We try to avoid inidb-requiring changes (like renaming a system
>> object...) during beta.

> Why?

So that beta testers won't be forced to do a dump and reload.

When and if pg_upgrade is actually 100% trustworthy, maybe the desire
to avoid initdb's after beta1 will vanish completely; but for now it's
still a good thing to avoid.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2011-01-07 19:56:12 Re: estimating # of distinct values
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-07 19:46:28 Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)