| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: system views for walsender activity |
| Date: | 2011-01-07 19:41:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1294429298.19612.18904.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 19:46, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> To my way of thinking, pg_stat_walsender and pg_stat_walreceiver would
> >> be more clear than pg_stat_replication_master and
> >> pg_stat_replication_slave.
> >
> > Let's commit it so that some of us can get a look at the data it
> > contains, and then we can fix the name during beta.
>
> We try to avoid inidb-requiring changes (like renaming a system
> object...) during beta.
Why?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-07 19:46:28 | Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-01-07 19:15:40 | Re: making an unlogged table logged |