| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: system views for walsender activity |
| Date: | 2011-01-07 20:34:55 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=o9rvDzYV9PEV=PF5iNqZDP0bkeM80mR__8MWh@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 20:51, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> We try to avoid inidb-requiring changes (like renaming a system
>>> object...) during beta.
>
>> Why?
>
> So that beta testers won't be forced to do a dump and reload.
>
> When and if pg_upgrade is actually 100% trustworthy, maybe the desire
> to avoid initdb's after beta1 will vanish completely; but for now it's
> still a good thing to avoid.
I think it's still a good thing to avoid. It's at that point no longer
as necessary, but it's still best if we can avoid to make those
changes after beta when possible.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-01-07 21:16:49 | Re: system views for walsender activity |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-01-07 20:18:41 | Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) |