From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6 |
Date: | 2004-12-03 19:14:56 |
Message-ID: | 29278.1102101296@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com> writes:
> On December 3, 2004 10:31 am, you wrote:
>> 2. There are critical notices on buildfarm for some more popular
>> platforms such as Solaris 9 and Open BSD.
> The OpenBSD error should be fixed by
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c?f=h;rev=1.60
Right, that was my silly oversight last night.
> and other than that I see noting on the build far that is questionable (other
> than the win32 regres test notice)
It's too bad the buildfarm reports don't show more details about what
CVS pull they're using exactly. I think that this case might be fixed
by the tweaking I did yesterday, but I can't tell whether that run
occurred before or after that commit. In any case it's not a real
failure, just an output-ordering difference.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-03 19:28:06 | Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-12-03 19:04:41 | Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl |