Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6

From: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6
Date: 2004-12-03 18:53:39
Message-ID: 200412031053.39617.darcy@wavefire.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On December 3, 2004 10:31 am, you wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>>OK, where are we in the release process? We still have a few open
> >>>items, but those can be moved to the TODO list. Do we do RC1 or
> >>>Beta6?
> >>
> >>Considering all the patching that has been going on recently and the
> >>fact that we don't have any port reports, I think it's too early for a
> >>"release candidate". I think we should release beta 6 immediately,
> >>call for port reports based on it, and then release RC1 as soon as we
> >>have an idea where the port reports are going, possibly in less than
> >>one week.
> >
> > What about the build farm? Can't we assume we are pretty close to RC?
>
> I would say no.
>
> 1. Buildfarm doesn't yet have that many platforms on it.
> 2. There are critical notices on buildfarm for some more popular
> platforms such as Solaris 9 and Open BSD.

The OpenBSD error should be fixed by
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c?f=h;rev=1.60

and other than that I see noting on the build far that is questionable (other
than the win32 regres test notice)

>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake

--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-12-03 19:04:41 Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-12-03 18:52:23 Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6