Re: pg_basebackup -k option

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup -k option
Date: 2018-05-18 14:46:37
Message-ID: 29277.1526654797@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The new pg_basebackup -k option stands for --no-verify-checksums. That
> is nearly the opposite of initdb -k, which is for enabling checksums. I
> think it could be confusing to have two related tools use the same
> option letter for nearly opposite purposes.

> How about using capital -K in pg_basebackup? Or maybe it doesn't need a
> short option at all.

+1 for no short option.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-05-18 14:49:30 Re: PG 11 feature count
Previous Message Sergei Kornilov 2018-05-18 14:45:33 Re: pg_basebackup -k option